Master Plan Executive
Summary
This is a text version
of the Master Plan and has been edited to a single-page single-column format by
user groups. Most photos and figures
have been deleted, but captions have been retained. Captions are RH justified
in smaller text.
|
2.1
FOREST RESOURCE ASSESSMENT
3.2
Historical Financial Performance
|
Chuck Meek and Daniel Wells enjoy early morning fishing on
Lunker Lake
County,
The diversity
of recreational opportunities is the obvious strength of the park. The outdoor
experience of
Evidence of the work of the CCC era remains throughout the park in
abandoned structures, foundations, bridges and certain infrastructure. Characterized by stonework quarried from
within the Park, these artifacts are reminders of the early camps, pavilions
and other park structures placed throughout the park by the CCC. The structures
were most often placed at higher elevations that provided spectacular views and
a true back to nature experience. These remaining structures and foundations
will serve as the design theme for improvements proposed throughout the park in
this Master Plan.
Passage of Act
272 by the state legislature in 1967 allowed 43 million dollars in bonds to be
issued for the construction, renovation and development of Alabama State Parks.
Development under this bond issue at
In 2000, the
state legislature passed Act 2000-708 issuing bonds in the amount of 104
million dollars for the renovation and development of Alabama State Parks.
With a
commitment to long-term planning, the Department of Conservation and Natural
Resources (DCNR) entered into a master planning effort with a team of planners,
engineers, architects, landscape architects and biologists led by CDG Engineers
& Associates, Inc.
This document
is the culmination of the planning effort and incorporates the vision of the
DCNR for
Included is a
physical analysis of the overall park and its facilities with an economic
analysis addressing the financial status of the park along with its existing
and potential markets. From these
analysis, the long term plan was created and is summarized in Chapter 4.
An implementation plan is provided in Chapter 5 that prioritizes components and
includes estimates of cost for each component. Finally, the reader may choose
to remove the Master Plan Map which can be located in the back of this document
for use as a companion reference to the text of this Executive Summary. The
comprehensive Master Plan is available for review at the DCNR office.
The plan
provides for the investment of bond funds where buildings, roads, and use areas
will be integrated into the
The plan
evokes opportunities to escape to the outdoors where visitors will encounter a
back to nature experience, breathtaking natural vistas and colorful view-sheds.
Old CCC Camp Office to be restored
Wildlife observers tour
The forest
resource on
There are two
significant considerations that shape the forests of mountainous regions:
aspect and position on slope. South and west facing slopes are typically drier
and warmer than north and east facing slopes, favoring conifers over hardwoods.
Ridge tops are typically also dominated by conifers, which are better able than
most hardwood species to cope with the thin soils, hotter fires, and harsher
conditions that occur there. The logging of most of the longleaf forest that
once dominated the southern, western, and southwestern slopes and subsequent
wildfire suppression allowed lighter seeded, more
aggressive species like loblolly pine to seed into the unoccupied sites. These
species are usually followed, in the continued absence of fire, by oaks,
hickories and other hardwoods. As the pines mature and die or are killed by
lightning, insects or disease, they are typically replaced by oaks and
hickories in southern forests.
These species
can live and regenerate under partial shade. Due to the long period without
significant disturbance of the canopy trees and particularly because of the
unnaturally high numbers of deer in the park, the forest is instead being
replaced by species which can regenerate successfully under full shade and
which are not eaten by deer. In the case of
Effects of
these shifts include poor wildlife habitat for almost all species and a steady
decline and loss of biodiversity in the wildlife and plant communities.
Longleaf
forests once dominated an estimated 90 million acres of uplands across the
Southeast. Today, there are less than 3 million acres remaining and much of
that is in poor condition. Mountain longleaf communities are perhaps the most
imperiled of the longleaf forest types.
Mountain
longleaf is unique and is limited to a small area in northwest
Shady canopies prevent regeneration
lose
most of that inherent diversity and threatens the continued existence of
longleaf on the park. Because they are unusually long-lived among pines, there
are still significant stands of longleaf on isolated portions of the park.
However, fuel has accumulated to dangerous levels, making re-introduction of
renewing fire a very risky prospect. The encroachment of
development, including a busy Interstate highway, make smoke management
an even greater concern than fire itself. Still, the highest ridgetops and
harshest sites support a very unique and attractive community of longleaf,
blackjack oak, and lush understory grasses, a legacy of past fires. Northern
and eastern slopes are typically occupied by hardwoods in mountainous terrain
in Southeastern forests. These slopes are typically cooler and moister, burn
less frequently, and are more productive. This is true of
The moist
lower slope cove sites and drains are among the richest on the entire park.
Ferns, buckeyes, grasses, and forbs occupy the lower canopy and understory of
these areas. White and chestnut oaks and yellow poplar are common in the
overstory. Water quality is good and these streams are attractive and generally
well maintained.
In summary,
the composition of the
Prepared by: Rhett Johnson,
Pine needles cover the forest floor Buckeyes flourish in shaded environs
Transportation
Visitors enter
The primary
traffic flow into the park travels
Secondary
traffic flow into
There are
currently five asphalt roadways within the park. These roadways consist of
Supplementing
the primary roadway network are several gravel and unimproved mountain roads
providing access to various attractions within the park, including
Currently
seven asphalt parking areas serve the park. These areas are located at the
Demonstration Farm, Golf Course,
Sanitary Sewer
Collection and Treatment System
The existing
sanitary sewer treatment system was installed in 1970 and is comprised of four
aeration lagoons discharging into a tributary of Dry Brook. In order to achieve
compliance with the Alabama Department of Environmental Management regulations
for sewage treatment, chlorine and other chemicals must be added frequently to
each of the lagoons. Many gravity collection and force main lines are made of
terra cotta, a clay material inherently faced with infiltration problems from
groundwater.
Lagoon No.1
serves the facilities located at and adjacent to the Demonstration Farm and
Stable facilities. Primary sewage uses in this area include comfort stations,
floor drains in the facilities complementing the demonstration farms, and
housing for the stable operator. The design capacity of the lagoon is 25,000
gallons and with relatively low flows from the Demonstration Farm and Stables
the waste is treated within acceptable limits.
Discharge of
the lagoon is in a tributary of Dry Brook, which frequently becomes submerged
during high intensity rainfall events resulting in limited discharge
capabilities.
Lagoon No.2
serves the primary Day Use area surrounding
The collection
system consists of terra cotta pipe suffering substantial infiltration and
inflow due to its close proximity to
Lagoon No.3
has a capacity of 25,000 gallons and serves the cabin area around
Due to improper
bedding during installation and close proximity to
Lagoon No.4
serves the campground consisting of 83 sewered camping sites, a Dump Station,
and comfort stations to accommodate the remaining 58 primitive campsites.
Sewage is collected and pumped to the 25,000 gallon lagoon located on the west
of the campground. Although the storage capacity of the lagoon is sufficient
for average flows from the campground the lagoon cannot accommodate peak flow
conditions or future developmental requirements as proposed. Chlorine and other
chemicals are frequently added following weekend usage of the park campgrounds
to meet treatment thresholds.
This
collection and lagoon system suffers inflow and infiltration problems as a result
of terra cotta mains lying adjacent to several major drainage systems of
In addition to
the treatment lagoons, several park facilities are served by on-site disposal
systems or "Septic Tank and Field Line" systems sized according to
standard practices of the State of Alabama Health Department.
The Golf Pro
Shop and Maintenance facilities are collected and are served by a septic tank
flowing to a "community" disposal field located in the golf course
driving range. Facilities in the
Water
Distribution System
The water
distribution system inside the park consists of three independent systems.
These distribution systems, supplying all park facilities, were installed in
1970. No major upgrades in material type or flow capabilities have been made to
the system since this original installation.
Water mains in
various areas of the park require upgrading and storage tanks require
preventive maintenance and painting.
In 1994 the
water supply for the park was converted from an on-site well system to the City
of
The first
distribution system, storing water for the majority of park facilities,
consists of three storage tanks with an overall storage capacity of 200,000
gallons. The second system, serving the Fishing Center area and comfort
stations east of Beaver and Lunker Lakes, originally utilized a well and
storage tank. These were abandoned in 1994 and water is supplied directly to
this area of the park from the City of
Day use areas will embrace the scenic
An analysis
was made of pertinent existing physiographic and built conditions within
ELEVATION and
SLOPE ANALYSIS
Elevations on
the
Much of the
valley floor falls within the 0% to 10% slope range, which are highly suited
for park development and other uses. The majority of the land in the park has
slope
conditions that fall within the 10% to 30% slope ranges. Recreation development
is feasible in these areas, which are generally located between the gently
sloping valley floors and the steep ridge lines associated with
SOIL
CONDITIONS
The soils in
The Nell,
Nauvoo and Bodine soils, commonly found on steeper hillsides along
The Minvale,
Nauvoo, Townley and Etowah soils are loam soils commonly located between the
ridge lines and valley floors. These soils are the most favorable soils in the
park for development due to their slope characteristics. The Etowah, Quitman,
and
In general,
the soil conditions present in the park have limitations that will increase the
development cost of certain sites more than others. However, with sound engineering
design and construction practices most of the soils outside the 100-year flood
plan and steep rock slopes found along major ridgelines can be developed.
EXISTING
VEGETATION
Forested lands
cover over 80% of the
Existing
wetlands within the park are very limited in number but generally occur
adjacent to the lake areas and along major drainage areas such as Dry Brook.
Because of the limited number of wetlands, minimal restrictions and impacts
from future development are likely to occur.
DRAINAGE
The Park can
be characterized as a ridge and valley system, which controls the direction and
rates of discharge into two major drainage basins: the
Drainage on
the westerly side of the mountains generally discharged through
The primary
drainage area found on this side of the mountains is Peavine Branch that
discharges at the southern boundary of the park and flows into Peavine Creek.
One of the most significant drainage features of the park is
The park
contains four major lakes:
FLOODPLAIN
A section of
the park located along portions of Dry Brook and other tributaries is currently
in the 100-year flood plain. Park officials have documented seasonal flooding
in the park in the past, mostly in the golf course area and in particular the
driving range. Currently, no existing park structures are known to exist in the
defined flood plains areas. The total area of 100-year flood plain in the park
is less than 200 acres in size and occurs for the most part in wooded
undeveloped areas of the park. It is recommended that hydrological analysis
should be conducted during the engineering of new use areas and sites in the
general vicinity of Dry Brook to prevent flooding of any potential structures
and/or improvements.
picturesque look across
PARK USE AREAS
There are a
variety of active and passive recreational uses and use areas within
In general,
use areas are located in various nodes throughout the park along or just off of
As a result
many park visitors drive from one use area to another. This situation suggests
that the master plan should consider potential ways to improve the linkages
between new and future use areas.
VISUAL
ANALYSIS
An analysis
and photographic documentation was conducted to assess positive and negative
visual conditions throughout the Park and identify problems / potentials that
can be incorporated into the master plan. Special attention was placed on the
use areas of the park most frequently visited by the public.
In summary,
the positive visual qualities found in the park greatly exceed the negative
qualities. The park contains beautiful views of lakes, creeks and streams,
waterfalls, mountain top scenery, mountain ridges, natural lands, fern glades,
wetlands, the golf course, historic structures and well-sited building and
facilities.
The master
plan recognizes the scenic beauty of these areas and will avoid developing new
use areas that may negatively impact the park. Efforts will be made to highlight
these areas to enable park users to experience the beauty of areas such as the
scenic overlook on top of
Changing foliage accent this beautiful prk
Many of the
visual problems in the park are found in and around the primary use areas.
These problems include; large expansive parking areas that need screening;
landscaping, poorly sited buildings; poor directional and informational signage
needing replacement; lack of screening of service areas and other undesirable
views; lack of landscaping and color; deteriorating facilities that need
maintenance or replacement; improved grounds maintenance; etc. Fortunately,
most of these visual problems can be resolved by proper planning, improved site
design, improved maintenance and other
recommended changes contained in the Master Plan.
The history of
The other
notable period of construction within the park took place in the early-1970s.
The main emphasis during this stage of construction was to build clusters of
buildings in an endeavor to form various use areas throughout the park. The
mentality was to concentrate less on quality per building and more on vast
construction efforts. These two decades of construction represent the backbone
of